Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
There is much advice available regarding the evaluation of open educational resources (OER). This page includes a selection of OER evaluation criteria.
If you are in need of assistance, do Ask a Librarian.
Faculty Guide for Evaluating Open Education Resources -- BCOER Librarians -- BC Open Campus
Six (6) criteria: Relevance; Accuracy; Production Quality; Accessibility; Interactivity; Licensing. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
OER Evaluation Criteria -- Affordable Learning Georgia
Six (6) criteria: Clarity, Comprehensibility, and Readability; Content Accuracy and Technical Accuracy; Adaptability and Modularity; Appropriateness; Accessibility; Supplementary Resources.
Rubrics for Evaluating Open Education Resource (OER) Objects -- Achieve
Eight (8) rubrics: Degree of Alignment to Standards; Quality of Explanation of the Subject Matter; Utility of Materials Designed to Support Teaching; Quality of Assessment; Quality of Technological Interactivity; Quality of Instructional and Practice Exercises; Opportunities for Deeper Learning; Assurance of Accessibility. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. | Also refer to Achieve's Open Educational Resources Evaluation Tool Handbook: https://www.achieve.org/files/AchieveOEREvaluationToolHandbookFINAL.pdf